Ascorbate: †The Science of Vitamin C
Ascorbate: Science of Vitamin C
ASCORBATE: THE SCIENCE OF VITAMIN C
"It's not what we don't know that harms us, but what we do know that ain't
so." (Mark Twain)
What is it about a little left-handed molecule of six carbons, six oxygens,
and eight hydrogens that ticks off so many in the medical community?
Maybe it's cases like this one: Ray, a health professional I know, had an
11-month old son who was very sick for over a week. No one, and I mean
no one, in their family had had any sleep in a long time. They were up
night after night with this child, who had a high fever, glazed watery eyes,
tons of thick watery mucus and labored breathing. The child would not
sleep, and did little else but cry. The baby was under the care of a
pediatrician, who, in the infant's eleven months on earth, had already
prescribed twelve rounds of some very serious antibiotics. That they
clearly were not working was all too apparent to Ray, who out of
desperation decided to try something he previously had been taught to not
try: bowel tolerance quantities of oral ascorbate. Ray and his wife gave
their baby some vitamin C about every 15 minutes. As a result, the baby
was noticeably improved in a matter of hours, and slept through the night.
With frequent doses continuing, the child was completely well in 48 hours.
Ray calculated that the baby had received just over 2,000 mg vitamin C
per kilogram body weight per day. This is even more than what Dr.
Frederick Robert Klenner customarily ordered for sick patients.
Remarkably, at 20,000 milligrams of vitamin C/day, that 20-pound baby
never had diarrhea.
With such a little body, you have to marvel at where all of it was going. Of
course, it is the opinion of those who promulgate the US RDA and related
nutritional mythology that almost all of that baby's vitamin C went uselessly
into the toilet. Ray and his wife would tell you differently. They would say
that their sick child soaked it up like a sponge, and then promptly got
For the layman unable to obtain intravenous vitamin C, one of the most
important parts of Hickey and Roberts' new book, Ascorbate: The Science
of Vitamin C, is its attention to oral administration, divided dosing,
absorption, and vitamin C retention time in the bloodstream. With simple
graphs and uncomplicated language, the authors illustrate 1) how high oral
doses of vitamin C yield higher blood levels of the vitamin, and 2) how
dividing the oral doses maintains those higher levels. Although initially
seeming almost too obvious to mention, these are not self-evident
concepts. Government-based intake standards such as the RDA hinge on
Hickey and Roberts zero in on this serious public health error. Their critical
analysis of research studies purporting to justify a mere 100 or 200 mg/day
ascorbate dose is worthy of Linus Pauling himself. Dr. Roberts says:
"Stressed and even mildly ill people can tolerate 1,000 times more vitamin
C, implying a change in biochemistry that was ignored in creating the
RDA. The RDA concept does not differentiate between short and long-
term effects of deprivation. The possibility that sub-clinical scurvy causes
chronic disease has enormous implications for health. In setting the RDA,
unsubstantiated risks of taking too much vitamin C have been accorded
great importance, whereas the risks of not taking enough have been
ignored. Real scientists understand that 'no scientific proof' is a fancy way
of saying 'we donít like this idea.' Furthermore, there is no clear
mechanism for the RDA to be modified when new scientific evidence
Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C is a compellingly written, fast-paced
inspection of belief-based bias that permeates the scientific method. It is
not a tirade; Hickey and Roberts simply tell it the way it is. They are well
qualified to do so. Steve Hickey has a PhD in Medical Biophysics from the
initially trained as a biologist specializing in pharmacology, later switching
to biomechanics and medical physics. In addition to degrees in physiology
computer science, Hilary Roberts'
on the effects of early life malnutrition. She spent ten years in research
and teaching at the university.
When asked how he and his coauthor came to write the book, Dr. Hickey
said: "Since Linus Pauling's death, there seemed to be a great deal of
misinformation. The NIH had performed some questionable experiments
and were making the apparently ridiculous statement that blood plasma
and tissues became saturated with low doses of vitamin C. There was no
mainstream research on high doses and the establishment was making
wild extrapolations from their low dose data. We could not see how a
clinical trial with 200 mg of vitamin C, for example, could be used to
suggest that higher doses were not effective. The work of physicians like
Robert Cathcart, Archie Kalokerinos and Abram Hoffer intrigued us. The
reported effects, especially of intravenous vitamin C, were astounding. It
was difficult to find any reason to explain the lack of scientific follow-up.
We had friends and relatives that were sick or dying from diseases that
high dose vitamin C was claimed to cure. Eventually we felt we had no
choice but to write the book."
Dr. Roberts adds: "Most RDA standards are based on data which was not
measured in actual experiments on real people. Even the small amount of
data from the 19Ė30 year old subjects, who were measured, is based on
neutrophils, a white blood cell type that is known to have unusual vitamin
C biochemistry, along with an exceptional ability to pump the vitamin into
itself. Neutrophils have ascorbate levels from 25-60 times that of the
surrounding plasma. This cell type is not a reliable model for the whole
Additional topics discussed in Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C
include infectious disease, oxidation and illness, the safety of vitamin C,
and a presentation of the authors' dynamic flow model of continual vitamin
C-mediated tissue reduction. The book contains substantial sections
devoted to cardiovascular disease, with the welcome inclusion of an
efficient discussion of the roles of vitamin E and lysine. Two excellent
chapters on cancer take the starch right out of the Mayo Clinic "refutations"
of the Pauling/Cameron vitamin C studies. The authors state that Dr.
Charles "Moertel's switch to oral does would clearly have biased the
results" even though Pauling "stated clearly that intravenous doses are
more effective than oral doses and explained the reasons for the
Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C contains 575 references, and
especially good ones. Though not alphabetized, all are keyed to the text
with numbered footnotes. For a book this important, the index could be
and should be more detailed. A glossary is included for the general reader.
All will enjoy the well-selected epigrams that form the chapter lead-in
The authors expert command of their topic has enabled them to
successfully encompass an enormous, and enormously important, subject.
To make a 216-page book this comprehensive, and also so exceptionally
comprehensible as well, is no small achievement.
I wish I'd had a book of this caliber back in the 1970's when my kids were
infants. I raised my children all the way into college without a single dose
of any antiviral, antihistamine, or antibiotic. What they did get were
megadoses of vitamin C. We, like so many other parents, learned the
principles of vitamin C therapy (quantity, frequency, and duration) at our
kids' bedsides at three in the morning.† Now, the pioneering work of
megascorbate orthomolecular physicians has been concisely summarized
and very skillfully explained in Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C. It is a
thorough, up to date and very readable analysis of what, to some, may still
appear to be a controversial topic.
Those who use it know that taking enough C results in three C's: patient
comfort, low cost, and parental control.† Without necessitating the use of
invasive technology, nor the trauma of hospitalization, parents can regain
confidence and mastery over illness to a degree that they might never
have thought possible. For this reason, vitamin C therapy will, at least in
some quarters, continue be decried and denounced as irresponsible. It
takes some real ego strength for a parent to stand firm and say, "This is
what I am going to do: I am going to follow the Klenner/Pauling/Cathcart
vitamin C protocol." Hickey and Roberts' review of vitamin C research is a
solid buttress that makes such a stance possible. No bias or belief system
can withstand their first-rate presentation of the safety and effectiveness of
megadoses of ascorbate.
Hickey S and Roberts H. Ascorbate: The science of vitamin C. 2004. ISBN
Reviewed by Andrew W. Saul.
Copyright 2005 by Andrew W. Saul.
AN IMPORTANT NOTE: This page is not in any way offered as prescription, diagnosis nor treatment for any disease, illness, infirmity or physical condition. Any form of self-treatment or alternative health program necessarily must involve an individual's acceptance of some risk, and no one should assume otherwise. Persons needing medical care should obtain it from a physician. Consult your doctor before making any health decision.
Neither the author nor the webmaster has authorized the use of their names or the use of any material contained within in connection with the sale, promotion or advertising of any product or apparatus. Single-copy reproduction for individual, non-commercial use is permitted providing no alterations of content are made, and credit is given.